Wow, as a longtime Battlefield fan, I've gotta say it's an absolute relief to see Battlefield 6 finally living up to the series' legacy! After the disaster that was Battlefield 2042, I'd almost lost hope—but these reviews confirm what my gut's been telling me since the beta: DICE is back in the saddle. The consensus is clear across every major outlet: this is the Battlefield we fell in love with years ago, polished to perfection and screaming with that signature all-out-war chaos. It’s like reuniting with an old friend who’s gotten a serious glow-up. 🎮
Let's talk numbers first because they don’t lie. Battlefield 6 is rocking an impressive 84 on Metacritic and OpenCritic, which blows Battlefield 2042’s dismal 68 out of the water. Sure, it’s not quite hitting the peak of Battlefield 3’s legendary 91, but damn, it’s close enough to feel like a victory lap. What’s wild is how consistent the praise is—even critics who usually snipe at military shooters are admitting this one’s special. Take Game Rant’s Dalton Cooper, who slapped a glowing 9/10 on it, calling it "a fully-featured FPS that should give genre fans countless hours of entertainment." I mean, when’s the last time we heard words like that about a Battlefield launch? Probably 2011!
Now, here’s where things get juicy. The multiplayer? Chef’s kiss. 💥 Harry Alston over at TheGamer nailed it in his 4/5 review, praising the return to that classic formula—bullets flying, tanks rumbling, buildings crumbling—all with buttery-smooth gameplay. But he’s not sugarcoating it either; he called out the lazy map design and the baffling absence of dedicated servers. Oof, DICE, why’d you skip those basics? Still, compared to his brutal 2/5 for 2042, this feels like redemption. Even Metro’s Adam Starkey, while giving a more reserved 7/10, admitted it’s a "refined restart" that captures the "thrilling spectacle of the classic entries." Translation: It’s not reinventing the wheel, but who cares when the ride’s this fun?
People Also Ask: How does Battlefield 6’s campaign stack up?
Honestly? It’s the weak link. IGN’s Simon Cardy torched it with a 5/10, calling it a "staggering spectacle" visually but slamming the "uninspired mission design and forgettable plot." At just five hours long, it’s over before it even finds its footing—like a fireworks show that fizzles after the first bang. If you’re buying this for solo play, you’ll feel shortchanged. But let’s be real: since when did anyone play Battlefield for the campaign? We’re here for the multiplayer mayhem!
And holy moly, that multiplayer delivers. 😍 The chaos is back—parachuting onto rooftops, flanking squads in crumbling streets, those "only in Battlefield" moments that make you scream into your headset. It’s clear DICE poured their soul into this, especially with Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 looming next month. Timing couldn’t be better; a whole month’s head start might just steal COD’s thunder. But here’s the kicker: insiders say this game’s success will decide DICE’s future. No pressure, right?
So yeah, Battlefield 6 isn’t perfect—campaign flops, some odd omissions—but as a package? It’s a glorious homecoming. If you’ve been burned by 2042, this is the apology letter you deserved. Now, I’m curious: what’s your take? Does Battlefield 6 finally recapture that magic for you, or is it still missing that special sauce?